Text: Ephesians
4: 7-8, 11-16
Focus: The
Church
Function: To
help people commit to our ministry.
Form:
Allegorical analogy
Taken directly from
N.T. Wright: Simply Christian, ppg 199-204
Intro:
Well, we have looked at
the importance of worship. We have looked at the power of prayer. We
have looked at the power of giving. We have looked at the power of
God's Word. And this morning, we are going to look at the power of
the Church.
You are here, so it
isn't a bad word. But out there, many people have serious doubts
about the purpose and nature of the Church.
What is the Church? Who
belongs to it, and how? Equally to the point, what is the Church for?
Our text from today
explains it pretty well. Verses 7,8, everyone of us is given a gift
to be used in the Church. We are all a part and we are all important
to Jesus, the Redeemer.
Verses 11-13. He gifts
some organization to this group. And the point is that we are all
charged with its success. The leaders work to equip people and
everybody works to build the Church.
We pass through
Chattanooga, OH on the way to get the grandkids. In that area, the
towns are either Catholic or Lutheran. Chattanooga is Lutheran and
for a year now, their sign keeps on saying: “We are the Church!”
God has placed us in
the Church and given it some form of Spiritual leadership.
And some people say, So
what?
Why is the growth of
the Church so important?
Is it there to bring
people back into the family of God, or is it there to prove which
brand of Christianity is more correct?
Is it about our
success, or is it about our love for Jesus?
N.T. Wright uses the
image of a river and a tree as being opposites, and yet both describe
the Church.
The river starts in
many places, springs, creeks, lakes, other rivers and from all over
converge into one single stream, “from diversity gives way to
unity,” he puts it.
The tree starts from
one small seed, to a trunk to branches to limbs, twigs and finally to
thousands of individual leaves. Unity generates diversity.
What is the Church? Who
belongs to it, and how? Equally to the point, what is the Church for?
Want the big answer?
The one you won't grasp even if I repeat it two to three times?
Here it is: The Church
is the single, multi-ethnic family promised by the Creator God to
Abraham. It was brought into being through Israel's Messiah, Jesus;
it was energized by God's Spirit; and it was called to bring the
transformative news of God's rescuing justice to the whole creation.
N.T. Wright tells us
that every bit of that definition matters.
Well, that is too many
thoughts for me to hold in my head at the same time.
So let us go back to
the river and the tree to break it down.
In no particular order,
first, let us look at the church as the river formed of thousands of
tributaries, scattered across the land coming to one single point.
In the OT, the “church”
was primarily made up of one family, the Jews. It had room for
others, some important ones, like Ruth and Rahab.
And once Jesus did what
He did, that inclusion became the new normal. People from every race,
every geographical, cultural and economic background, every shape,
sort and size were called and welcomed into this new family.
And secondly, the
Church is the many branched tree that was planted by God. It started
with Abraham: it is the tree whose single trunk is Jesus and whose
many branches, leaves, twigs, leaves and so on are the millions of
Christian communities and billion+ of Christian individuals around
the world.
A central way to
consider this is to back to our text and in verse 12 where the
reference is to the Body of Christ. It is one central body in which
every community is a limb and an organ and every cell and individual.
From Diversity, unity
and from unity, diversity, both are happening at the same time.
But the reference in
this passage is more than a symbol of unity -we are all one, and
diversity -we have different functions. No, the image is a way of
saying that we are all called to do
the work of Christ, to be the means of Jesus' action
in and for the world.
The image is the Church
is Jesus, literally. It is the only way that Jesus can bring people
back into the redemption of God.
In
both of these ideas, the river and the tree, the word family
is not too far off. But it is important that we keep it in context.
Brothers and sisters can fight, can grow up to be two completely
different individuals. But the Bible often refers to us as brothers
and sisters. We have the same Creator, the same Father and Mother.
The
early Church practiced that familial care for each other very well.
They even lived together in an extended community and shared physical
resources. When they talked about “love” the main thing they
meant: living as a single family, a mutually supporting community.
The Church must never forget that calling. It went as far as this: If
any man had any possession, it belonged to all of them (Acts
4:32-22). They were serious about their commitment to being the
body of Christ, His agents for healing the world around them.
But
at the same time, the idea of family can take us in the wrong
direction. Even Billy Graham has said something important: “God has
no grandchildren.”
And
it is illustrated in one of the first conflicts the Church had to
endure. The first Church was primarily Jewish. And they practiced all
the Jewish laws, they wouldn't eat pork, worship was on Saturday
instead of Sunday, they couldn't eat a medium rare steak, they
circumcised their sons and they were no allowed to eat with Non
Jewish people.
So, how could they be a
family when they couldn't eat together? They had a problem to solve.
And their reasons were not based on prejudice, but based on what they
felt their religion taught them to do.
So they all got
together to talk about whether or not they should eat separately, and
the answer they came up with was a resounding NO! God welcomes Jews
and Non Jews and doesn't require the Non Jews to become Jewish with
all of their laws.
Big deal so far except
this. At the same time, they decided that Jewish ancestry did not
automatically bring them into the renewed family which God was
creating though Jesus.
At the same time, a
person does not belong to Jesus and His people, His body, simply
because they were born into a Christian family.
Family
plays an huge part as to whether or not a person chooses to be a part
of the body of Christ. Kids get introduced to Jesus at a young age,
through family, the Church, Sunday School and other activities that
we do. But we all know that it is perfectly possible for someone to
grow up in a Christian household and turn their back on the faith and
life.
Many branches fall of
the tree, and many streams come together into the single river. Being
born into a particular human family does not determine whether or not
you will be come a member of the family of God.
You have to choose for
yourselves.
What it truly means to
be a part of this family, to be a branch on this tree, to be part of
the current flowing in this great big river seems to be lost in the
emphasis of individualism in Western culture.
In our culture, we
almost worship individualism. In individualism, we are tempted to
base our decision about where we worship on what “meets my needs,”
or what makes me feel good. But our decision is based on the calling
God has placed before us.
I
know this, it is never going to be perfect, and since I am involved,
the people are not going to be perfect.
Sometimes,
being in a family means that we have stress about certain differences
in personality or style. In family, we have to work it out. But if it
is based on individualism, we do not get the discipline in love, we
just leave.
But our Western culture
causes us to focus only on ourselves as if we are individuals who
have no need for each other. The concept of belonging to each other:
as a real-live family, or even deeper: as part of a singular body
seems foreign to us when we realize that it just might cost us.
Individualism tells us that the only cost it has on us are the ones
that are convenient. But if a single body loses a hand, or a foot, or
eyesight, that pain and loss is never convenient.
We are interdependent.
Now, as we mentioned,
each of us must respond to God on an personal, or individual, level.
You can hide in the shadows in the back of the church for a while,
but sooner or later, you are going to have to decide whether or not
this is for you.
In 1
Corinthians 12, Paul tells us that the body is made of different
parts. There are feet, hands, eyes and etc. The foot is no less a
member than the hand, the hand no less than the eye. And if they are
all there, the body works much better than having to suffer through
life without an individual component. No one member should deem
itself more important than another. They are all needed. All.
Turn
to the person next to you and tell them: “I need you.” “You
help complete my Christian life.”
(I was going to say “you complete me,” but Valentines day is
past.)
At the same time, if
the foot, hand, eye or whatever, decided that it doesn't need the
rest of the body and is cut off, it dies.
So, turn to the
person next to you and say: “you are vital to my Christian life.”
Cutting ourselves off
would deny the very purpose for which the Church was called into
being. According to the early Christians, The church doesn't exist in
order to provide a place where people can pursue their private
spiritual agendas and develop their own spiritual potential. Nor dies
it exist in order to provide a safe heaven in which people can hide
from the wicked world and ensure that they themselves arrive safely
at an otherworldly destination. Private spiritual growth and ultimate
salvation come rather as the by products of the main, central,
overarching purpose for which God has and is calling us.
This purpose is clear.
Through the church, God will announce to the wider world hat he is
indeed its wise, loving, and just Creator; that through Jesus he has
defeated the powers that corrupt and enslave it; and that by His
Spirit, He is at work to heal and renew it.
The Church exists for
its Mission. To announce to the Word that Jesus is the Redeemer. The
gospel changes and transforms. We are partners with God putting the
world to the rights.
Preachers think to
highly of themselves. They think that they can create growth. Indeed,
this passage tells us that God gave them as Catalysts to the growth.
But Growth isn't the responsibility of the preacher. We grow, when we
are on the Mission.
We are partners with
God to do God's work. But the message of those who have adapted that
individualism mindset is the other way around, they think that God is
partner with us to fulfill our lives. Sometimes I wonder if that is
why people flock to the mega-churches. Have they successfully
converted Christianity into a consumer commodity that is a resource
for them to realize their own wants, desires and dreams.
Now, I promise you that
serving Jesus is an invitation to a great adventure that will give
your life eternal meaning. I promise that. It is biblical, Jesus said
our lives would be lived to the full and out of us would flow rivers
of living water that will indeed change the world.
Western Individualism
has subtly changed the message to this: God is partner, or more than
likely, servant to us in order for us to reach our full potential.
We will reach full
potential, but only in the context of what we learned in prayer,
“God's will be done (not ours) in earth as it is in heaven.”
We are Christ's body,
doing Christ's work.
So, God has no
grandchildren. The choice to believe, to join is not forced on any
person. It isn't something that we inherit because we live in a
predominately Christian nation, or came from Christian families. It
is an personal choice we make. We believe. And then we belong. And
belonging takes up our being.
No comments:
Post a Comment